Amazon Pushes to Repeal Washington’s Most Ambitious Climate Law

By: Julia | Published: May 10, 2024

Large companies such as Amazon have led a counter-push in the efforts to repeal Washington’s most ambitious climate law. The state’s 2021 Climate Commitment Act, also called “cap and invest,” may be repealed this November.

Many Washington residents don’t want this to happen, as they want to continue to fight climate change. Surprisingly, companies like Amazon and BP have also agreed to fight this ballot initiative to help keep the climate change policy in place. 

Cap and Invest

The Cap and Invest Act that Washington passed in 2021 requires companies that release high emissions to pay for the pollution they create.

Advertisement
Water and green trees in front of a mountain seen at a Washington state park.

Source: Pavł Polø/Unsplash

They must pay for this pollution in what is called a carbon market. This market, which first began operating just last year, has already raised $2 billion for Washington and its state-funded programs. 

How the Carbon Market Works

Washington state’s companies that are considered the largest emitters must buy allowances that cover their emissions. They must buy enough allowances to cover most of their greenhouse gases.

Advertisement
Mount Baker in Washington seen in the daytime.

Source: Toan Chu/Unsplash

The purchases of these allowances occur at auctions that can be run by either the state or secondary markets. Only companies that produce more than 25,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide in a year in Washington have to buy back these allowances. 

Some Companies Are Exempt

Some companies, particularly smaller ones, are exempt from this program and market. For example, gas and electric utility companies tend to get all of their allowances for free.

Advertisement
A body of water seen in front of hills and a mountain at Diablo Lake, Washington.

Source: Brewing Cats/Unsplash

Only companies that emit massive amounts of carbon dioxide into Washington truly are affected by this market. For the most part, these companies are in the gas or oil industries. 

Pushing for Lower Emissions

The goal of this market is to push massive corporations to lower the amount of emissions they create. To successfully do this, the number of allowances that are available to purchase is decreased every year.

Advertisement
Water, rocks, and bushes seen in front of a mountain at Enchantment Peaks, Washington.

Source: David Merrick/Unsplash

This pushes these companies to further lower their emissions. Companies can also reduce their emissions by selling any surplus allowances that they may have. Corporations that need these extra allowances can buy them, resulting in the market having a trade aspect to it. 

Raising Money in Washington

Washington receives the money through these auctions by selling these allowances to corporations. So far, these auctions have resulted in Washington receiving about $1.9 billion.

Advertisement
Cars on a bridge entering Washington state in the daytime.

Source: Andy Li/Unsplash

This money has been spent on a variety of state-funded programs. It has helped transportation, infrastructure, and state-run climate programs. 

Advertisement

A New Challenge

Now, this climate act faces a new challenge. Critics of the act have put forth initiative I-2117 on the upcoming ballot in November.

Advertisement
Rocks, grass, trees, and a body of water seen before Thorp Mountain in Washington.

Source: Vincent Etter/Unsplash

This initiative would completely repeal the law — and further prevent any other similar type of law from being enacted in the state. This law is bankrolled and backed by a wealthy investor who lives in the Seattle area. 

Advertisement

An Increase in Fuel Costs

For the most part, conservatives are backing the repeal of this act. Those in support of this initiative have stated that the carbon market increases fuel costs for average Washington residents — particularly those who cannot afford it.

Advertisement
A person pumps gas into their car.

Source: MarkBuckawicki/Wikimedia Commons

They have claimed this occurs because oil companies have simply increased their costs to customers to pay for the extra money they’re spending at the carbon market. 

Advertisement

Gas Prices

Gas prices have gone up throughout Washington. In some areas, such as Seattle, gas is now more than $5. However, supporters of the climate law explain that gas has gone up in the state before — and it’s always come back down.

Advertisement
Many cars at a gas station at night.

Source: Jay Skyler/Unsplash

Others cite different factors for these increased gas prices, such as geopolitical concerns in the Middle East. 

Advertisement

Supporters of This Climate Law

Interestingly, many different kinds of supporters have backed this climate law. As a result, they’ve decided to push against this initiative that is trying to repeal the act.

Advertisement
Water and green trees in front of a mountain seen at a Washington state park.

Source: Pavł Polø/Unsplash

Most notably, BP Plc, a major oil corporation, is pushing a “No on 2117” message and urging residents “to vote no on this initiative and keep the state’s carbon pricing program alive.”

Advertisement

Other Companies Pushing Against Repeal

Other billionaires and companies have also joined the fight to stop this law from being repealed, surprising many climate activities. Bill Gates has given $1 million to the coalition tasked with defeating the initiative. 

Advertisement
A smartphone open to the Amazon app.

Source: Christian Wiediger/Unsplash

Amazon.com Inc. has also joined the effort alongside various labor forces that are trying to keep the climate law in place. 

Advertisement

A Fight Against Climate Change

Washington’s law is one of the most ambitious laws seen in the country to fight climate change. Pam Kiely, the associate vice president for U.S. climate policy at the Environmental Defense Fund, explained that losing this program would be detrimental to the state and the entire country.

Advertisement
The North Cascades in Washington seen in the daytime.

Source: Andrew Rivera/Unsplash

Kiely stated, “Losing those tons matters not just to Washington and how they are going to meet their goals, but it broadly matters in the context of how the U.S. is going to meet its targets.”

Advertisement