Biden’s $4.5 Billion Bet on ‘Racist Highway’ Removal Faces Uncertain Future

By: Sam Watanuki | Last updated: Sep 03, 2024

The Biden-Harris administration has committed $4.5 billion to remove inner-city highways that are seen as remnants of systemic racism. These highways, built in the mid-20th century, often cut through minority neighborhoods, dividing communities and causing lasting economic and social damage.

But as the end of Biden’s term approaches, the future of this ambitious plan remains uncertain.

The Rationale Behind the Initiative

The highway removal effort aims to reconnect communities separated by roadways and heal the scars left by past infrastructure decisions. Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg stated in 2021, “There is racism physically built into some of our highways.”

Advertisement
Aerial Photo of Buildings and Roads

Source: Aleksejs Bergmanis/Pexels

The administration hopes to create jobs, reduce emissions, and foster equity in urban development with this initiative.

Financial Commitment and Legislative Support

Congress allocated around $4.2 billion for these highway removal projects through two major laws passed in 2021 and 2022. The “Reconnecting Communities” pilot program received $1 billion, and another $3 billion was set aside for “Neighborhood Access and Equity” grants.

Advertisement
Two Person in Long-sleeved Shirt Shakehand

Source: Cytonn Photography/Pexels

These funds were intended to help cities across the U.S. remove highways and reconnect urban neighborhoods.

Early Successes and Challenges in Syracuse and Rochester

In places like Syracuse and Rochester, New York, local officials have worked for years to remove highways dividing their cities.

Advertisement
Light Trails on Highway at Night

Source: Pixabay/Pexels

In Syracuse, a $180 million federal grant is slated to help replace a section of Interstate 81. Rochester’s successful removal of a part of its Inner Loop in 2014 has inspired similar projects, demonstrating both the benefits and challenges of such undertakings.

Slow Progress in Funding Allocation

Despite the ambitious goals, progress has been slow. As of now, only about 4% of the $3.5 billion in announced grants has been fully obligated by the Department of Transportation.

Advertisement
A photograph of several US bills

Source: Freepik

Many grants require local agencies to sign funding agreements with the federal government, a process that has proven time-consuming and complex.

Potential Impact of a Trump Administration

If former President Donald Trump wins a second term, the future of the highway removal initiative could be in jeopardy. A new administration might prioritize different infrastructure projects or change the criteria for awarding grants.

Advertisement
Former U.S. President Donald Trump speaks at a campaign rally at the Trump National Doral Golf Club on July 09, 2024 in Doral, Florida. Trump continues to campaign across the country

Source: Joe Raedle/Getty Images

Equity, a core principle guiding the current grants, could be removed, shifting the focus away from rebuilding communities of color.

Advertisement

DOT’s Efforts to Expedite Funding Agreements

In response to the slow pace of progress, the Department of Transportation has been working to expedite the grant process. They are providing technical assistance and expediting paperwork with local sponsors to ensure agreements are signed.

Advertisement
A photograph of several cars passing quickly along a multi-lane road

Source: Freepik

The majority of significant projects are expected to have agreements in place by January 2025.

Advertisement

Kamala Harris and the Highway Removal Push

Vice President Kamala Harris has been a vocal supporter of the highway removal initiative. In April 2024, she visited Atlanta to promote a $185 million grant aimed at building a cap over a downtown freeway.

Advertisement
A photograph of Kamala Harris during a speech

Source: Wikimedia

This project seeks to reconnect a historic African-American neighborhood with the city’s business district, highlighting the administration’s commitment to racial equity in infrastructure.

Advertisement

Local Perspectives

For many in cities like Rochester and Syracuse, the highway removal projects represent an opportunity to correct past injustices. Local activists, such as Shawn Dunwoody of Rochester, emphasize the importance of community input in these projects.

Advertisement
A photograph of several cars in a traffic jam

Source: Wikimedia

“These neighborhoods were destroyed,” Dunwoody said. “Everyone got treated the same—poorly.” The projects aim to restore not just infrastructure but also community trust and cohesion.

Advertisement

Broader Impact of Highway Removal Projects

Removing highways can have broad economic and social benefits. In Rochester, tearing down a section of the Inner Loop created 7 acres of land for new development, adding over $250 million to the city’s tax base.

Advertisement
A photograph of traffic in a city

Source: Wikimedia

These projects offer a chance to increase urban density, reduce reliance on cars, and foster more sustainable city planning.

Advertisement

Future Challenges and Considerations

While there are significant benefits, the challenges are just as real. Funding delays, political opposition, and administrative hurdles have slowed progress.

Advertisement
A photograph of a construction site

Source: Freepik

Moreover, concerns about gentrification and displacement of existing residents pose potential risks to achieving the intended goals of these projects.

Advertisement

The Uncertain Future of Biden’s Bet

As President Biden’s term winds down, his bold bet on removing “racist highways” faces an uncertain future.

Advertisement
A photograph of Joe Biden on stage

Source: Wikimedia

The slow pace of funding allocation, the possibility of political shifts, and the complexity of urban redevelopment all contribute to a challenging path ahead.

Advertisement